Original Research

Reward preferences for generations in selected Information and Communication Technology companies

Annetjie Moore, Mark Bussin
SA Journal of Human Resource Management | Vol 10, No 1 | a325 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhrm.v10i1.325 | © 2012 Annetjie Moore, Mark Bussin | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 20 September 2010 | Published: 25 September 2012

About the author(s)

Annetjie Moore, Department of Industrial Psychology and People Management, University of Johannesburg, South Africa
Mark Bussin, Department of Industrial Psychology and People Management, University of Johannesburg, South Africa

Abstract

Orientation: Previous research suggests that different generations have different reward preferences based on differences in values, frames of reference and life goals.

Research purpose: The focus of this study was to determine whether different generations prefer different rewards in the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) industry in South Africa.

Motivation for the study: The rationale for this study was to obtain a better understanding of the reward preferences of Veterans, Baby Boomers, Generation X and Generation Y in the ICT industry.

Research design, approach and method: The research was a quantitative, cross-sectional, correlational design. Participants from two ICT companies completed a structured electronic survey. One hundred and sixty four valid responses were received. A Cronbach’s alpha of 0.821 indicates that the survey was reliable.

Main findings: Contrary to previous research, the results show that generations do not display different reward preferences.

Practical/managerial implications: It would be more beneficial to use individual interrelationship factors to develop a reward strategy than generations.

Contribution/value-add: The research has added insight and value to reward preferences for generations in the ICT sector.


Keywords

Reward preferences; generations; learning and development; pay; rewards; work environment

Metrics

Total abstract views: 8254
Total article views: 19498

 

Crossref Citations

1. Multigenerational Differences in Career Preferences, Reward Preferences and Work Engagement among Indian Employees
Deepak Chawla, Afsha Dokadia, Snigdha Rai
Global Business Review  vol: 18  issue: 1  first page: 181  year: 2017  
doi: 10.1177/0972150916666964

2. A comparative study on the work reward preferences between Generation X and Generation Y
Tengku Elena Tengku Mahamad, Amirah Mardhiah Khairil Annuar, Wan Soraya Wan Abdul Ghani
GATR Global Journal of Business Social Sciences Review  vol: 2  issue: 3  first page: 46  year: 2014  
doi: 10.35609/gjbssr.2014.2.3(8)

3. Perspectives of nurses regarding total rewards and their preferences in Thailand: A qualitative descriptive study
Kulwadee Abhicharttibutra, Orn‐Anong Wichaikhum, Apiradee Nantsupawat, Wipada Kunaviktikul, Sue Turale
International Nursing Review  vol: 70  issue: 2  first page: 229  year: 2023  
doi: 10.1111/inr.12784

4. Exploring the Relationship Between Learning Goal Orientation and Knowledge-Sharing Among Information Communication Technology Consultants: The Role of Incentive Schemes
Linpei Song, Zhuang Ma, Jun Huang
Frontiers in Psychology  vol: 13  year: 2022  
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.798668

5. Do talent management strategies influence the psychological contract within a diverse environment?
Paul Poisat, Michelle R. Mey, Gary Sharp
SA Journal of Human Resource Management  vol: 16  year: 2018  
doi: 10.4102/sajhrm.v16i0.1044

6. Total rewards preferences: A cross‐sectional study among two generations of nurses in rural and remote Thailand
Kulwadee Abhicharttibutra, Orn‐Anong Wichaikum, Apiradee Nantsupawat, Wipada Kunnaviktikul, Sue Turale
International Nursing Review  vol: 71  issue: 4  first page: 758  year: 2024  
doi: 10.1111/inr.12905

7. The relationship between occupational culture dimensions and reward preferences: A structural equation modelling approach
Mark Bussin, Michelle Nicholls, Ronel Nienaber
SA Journal of Human Resource Management  vol: 15  year: 2016  
doi: 10.4102/sajhrm.v14i1.737