Original Research
Factors influencing managers’ attitudes towards performance appraisal
Submitted: 24 October 2016 | Published: 29 May 2017
About the author(s)
Tanya du Plessis, Department of Industrial and Organisational Psychology, University of South Africa, South AfricaAnnelize van Niekerk, Department of Industrial and Organisational Psychology, University of South Africa, South Africa
Abstract
Orientation: Managers often have negative attitudes towards performance appraisal because of its problematic nature, which is influenced by political and social contextual factors. These negative attitudes lead to reduced employee support, inaccurate performance appraisal ratings and, consequently, negative employee perceptions of the performance appraisal process. This state of affairs necessitates a deeper understanding of the factors influencing managers’ attitudes towards performance appraisal.
Research purpose: The purpose of this research was to gain a deeper understanding of the factors that influence managers’ attitudes towards performance appraisal.
Motivation for the study: Previous research has confirmed the importance of performance appraisals in organisations. However, managers’ dislike of and aversion to performance appraisal impact negatively on the effectiveness of performance appraisal systems and ultimately the development and performance of employees.
Research design, approach and method: An interpretivist qualitative study was adopted, utilising naïve sketches and in-depth interviews to collect data from eight managers, purposively selected. The data were analysed by using Tesch’s descriptive data analysis technique.
Main findings: This study revealed that performance appraisal is fundamentally an uncomfortable and emotional process for managers, which results in their adopting defensive attitudes. Because of many uncertainties, managers do not always display the ability or readiness to conduct performance appraisals. The organisational context might place the individual manager in a position to distort employee ratings, which in turn negatively influences that manager’s attitude.
Practical and managerial implications: This study provides insight into the present-day experience of managers in respect of performance appraisal and highlights the factors that influence their attitudes.
Contribution: The insight gained from this research into the factors impacting on the attitude of managers towards performance appraisals can assist organisations to better support and empower such managers to be more effective in their approach when conducting performance appraisals.
Keywords
Metrics
Total abstract views: 12598Total article views: 16122
Crossref Citations
1. Komunikacijos specialistų vaidmens paradoksas: atotrūkis tarp teorinio ir praktinio požiūrių ir jį lemiantys veiksniai
Lina Jakučionienė
Information & Media vol: 96 first page: 161 year: 2023
doi: 10.15388/Im.2023.96.72
2. Improving the Climate of Organizational Work Units through Socially Constructed Performance Appraisals
Joshua Burton, Michael Boyd
The Pinnacle: A Journal by Scholar-Practitioners vol: 2 issue: 1 year: 2024
doi: 10.61643/c35090
3. Embedded, necessary, and problematic: the politics of Canadian university deans’ reappointments
Eric Lavigne
Studies in Higher Education vol: 47 issue: 3 first page: 604 year: 2022
doi: 10.1080/03075079.2020.1770718
4. How structural and procedural features of managers' performance appraisals facilitate their politicization: A study of Canadian university deans’ reappointments
Eric Lavigne
European Management Journal vol: 36 issue: 5 first page: 638 year: 2018
doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2018.06.001
5. The impact of total rewards [TR] on employee retention: a case of first aluminum of Nigeria (FAN) organisation
Oluwasegun A. Ojediran, Rufus O. Adebayo
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478) vol: 12 issue: 3 first page: 122 year: 2023
doi: 10.20525/ijrbs.v12i3.2279
6. The delivery of bad news: An integrative review and path forward
Claudia C. Kitz, Laurie J. Barclay, Heiko Breitsohl
Human Resource Management Review vol: 33 issue: 3 first page: 100971 year: 2023
doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2023.100971
7. Examining the assumption of measurement invariance in job performance ratings across time: The role of rater experience
Diogo Borba, Jeffrey R. Spence
International Journal of Selection and Assessment vol: 32 issue: 1 first page: 69 year: 2024
doi: 10.1111/ijsa.12449
8. Exploring employees’ experiences with the performance appraisals at the South African Air Force
Bernardt Oschman, Mokgata A. Matjie
SA Journal of Human Resource Management vol: 3 year: 2025
doi: 10.4102/sajhrm.v23i0.2925
9. Challenges in the Implementation of Performance Management System in Namibian Public Sector
Stewart Kaupa, Sulaiman Olusegun Atiku
International Journal of Innovation and Economic Development vol: 6 issue: 2 first page: 25 year: 2020
doi: 10.18775/ijied.1849-7551-7020.2015.62.2003
10. What helps managers being fair? Predicting managers’ self-reported justice enactment during pay setting using the ability-motivation-opportunity framework
Constanze Eib, Helena Falkenberg, Johnny Hellgren, Sofia Malmrud, Magnus Sverke
The International Journal of Human Resource Management vol: 33 issue: 10 first page: 2138 year: 2022
doi: 10.1080/09585192.2020.1852590