Original Research
Perception of performance management system by academic staff in an open distance learning higher education environment
Submitted: 14 January 2016 | Published: 31 October 2016
About the author(s)
Esther M. Maimela, Department of Human Resource Management, University of South Africa, South AfricaMichael O. Samuel, Department of Management and Human Resource Management, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa
Abstract
Orientation: Institutions of higher learning in South Africa are fast embracing performance management system (PMS) as a mechanism for the achievement of teaching excellence and enhancement of research productivity. However, literature provided evidence to show that application of PMS in the private sector had failed to drive competition, efficiency and productivity.
Research purpose: The main purpose of this article was to evaluate the perception of academic staff members of an open distance learning institution regarding the implementation of a PMS.
Motivation for the study: PMS as a mechanism through which performance of academics is measured has been described as inconsistent with the long tradition of academic freedom, scholarship and collegiality in the academy. Moreso, previous research on the implementation of PMS was limited to private sector organisations, thus resulting in the dearth of empirical literature relating to its practice in service-driven public sector institutions.
Research design, approach and method: The article adopted a quantitative research approach using census survey methodology. Data were collected from 492 academic staff from the surveyed institution using a self-developed questionnaire that was tested for high content validity with a consolidated Cronbach’s alpha value of 0.83. Data were analysed using a onesample t-test because of the one-measurement nature of the variable under investigation.
Main findings: Major findings of the study indicated that respondents were satisfied with the implementation of the PMS by management. However, the payment of performance bonuses was not considered as sufficiently motivating, thus necessitating a pragmatic review by management.
Practical/managerial implications: The findings of this article provided a practical guide to managers on the implementation and management of PMS as an employee performance reward mechanism in non-profit and service-oriented organisations.
Contribution: This article provided an incremental contribution to the body of literature in the broad field of management and a further advancement of existing knowledge in the sub-field of performance management system.
Keywords
Metrics
Total abstract views: 7938Total article views: 13849
Crossref Citations
1. Talent management practices in a selected South African higher education institution
Rhodrick Musakuro
Problems and Perspectives in Management vol: 20 issue: 1 first page: 532 year: 2022
doi: 10.21511/ppm.20(1).2022.42
2. Perceived Impact of Academic Staff Performance on Productivity: The Case of Maputo Pedagogical University in Mozambique
CB Caixote, T Molokwane, B Mothusi
Journal of Public Administration and Development Alternatives vol: 7 issue: 3 first page: 20 year: 2022
doi: 10.55190/VXOK7874
3. Intergrating the performance management system of a university in South Africa with its strategic plan
Malefetsane A. Mofolo, Cawe S. Novukela
SA Journal of Human Resource Management vol: 22 year: 2024
doi: 10.4102/sajhrm.v22i0.2404
4. Performance management system in the higher learning institutions in Tanzania: horses for courses?
Thobias Komungemwe, Ramadhani Marijani
Cogent Education vol: 12 issue: 1 year: 2025
doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2025.2453277
5. Assessing results-based personnel performance system in the Ministry of Home and Child Care, Zimbabwe
Mervis Chiware, Shikha Vyas-Doorgapersad
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478) vol: 11 issue: 7 first page: 322 year: 2022
doi: 10.20525/ijrbs.v11i7.1999
6. Levers of Control, Counterproductive Work Behavior, and Work Performance: Evidence From Indonesian Higher Education Institutions
Kristin Rosalina, Ruzita Jusoh
Sage Open vol: 14 issue: 3 year: 2024
doi: 10.1177/21582440241278455