Original Research

Generational differences in workplace motivation

Marita M. Heyns, Marilyn D. Kerr
SA Journal of Human Resource Management | Vol 16 | a967 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhrm.v16i0.967 | © 2018 Marita M. Heyns, Marilyn D. Kerr | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 21 June 2017 | Published: 08 August 2018

About the author(s)

Marita M. Heyns, Optentia Reseach Focus Area, North-West University, South Africa
Marilyn D. Kerr, North-West University Business School, North-West University, South Africa

Abstract

Orientation: Despite increasing age diversity in the workforce, organisations still know relatively little about how potentially diverging motivational needs of the various generations might influence motivational strategies and organisational performance.

Research purpose: To explore the relationship between multigenerational workforces and employee motivation within a South African workplace setting from a self-determination theory perspective.

Motivation for the study: The pursuit of performance excellence requires an understanding of the enablers of optimal performance. In South Africa, the workplace landscape is changing fast as younger generations are joining the workforce in rapidly growing numbers. These younger employees are often believed to differ quite drastically from the older generations in terms of their values and priorities, which necessitates a deeper understanding of the motivational drivers of the different cohorts as these manifest within a workplace environment.

Research approach/design and method: A cross-sectional survey approach and a quantitative research design were used (N = 164). Two questionnaires founded on self-determination theory were administered, namely the Work-Related Basic Need Satisfaction Scale and the Work Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation Scale.

Main findings: Findings contradict the popular notion that generational cohorts differ significantly from each other in terms of diverging intrinsic and extrinsic motivational preferences that may influence their behaviour at work. With regard to the degrees of satisfaction of the basic psychological needs that drive autonomous, intrinsically motivated behaviour specifically, no practically significant differences were found either. There was, however, one notable difference, namely in the indicated degree of satisfaction of the psychological need for autonomy between Generation Y and Generation X cohorts.

Practical/managerial implications: Management is advised to cultivate a motivational climate that promotes autonomously motivated behaviour in general and to focus on specific known individual motivational preferences that may exist within groups rather than approaching generational cohorts as homogenous groups.

Contribution/value-add: This study contributes to the limited research regarding similarities and differences in the intrinsic versus extrinsic motivational stance of three different generations as these manifest within a workplace setting in an emerging economy country. Findings afford management insight into motivational processes that are most influential among generational cohorts and assist them in adapting suitable motivational strategies that can ultimately improve retention of valued employees.

Keywords

generations; psychological needs; motivation; self-determination theory

Metrics

Total abstract views: 17256
Total article views: 25088

 

Crossref Citations

1. The impact of work engagement of different generations on organisational engagement
Gita Šakytė-Statnickė, Svitlana Bilan, Asta Savanevičienė
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES  vol: 16  issue: 4  first page: 136  year: 2023  
doi: 10.14254/2071-8330.2023/16-4/9

2. Marketing de contenidos y la decisión de compra del consumidor de la generación Y
Paula Pachucho-Hernández, Jorge Cueva-Estrada, Nicolás Sumba-Nacipucha, Stella Delgado-Figueroa
IPSA Scientia, revista científica multidisciplinaria  vol: 6  issue: 3  first page: 44  year: 2021  
doi: 10.25214/27114406.1123

3. Kuşakların Bakış Açısından Sessiz İstifa Kavramının Analiz Edilmesine Yönelik Nitel Bir Araştırma
Mukaddes Güler
Hitit Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi  vol: 18  issue: 2  first page: 408  year: 2025  
doi: 10.17218/hititsbd.1647778

4. Impact of Age Management on Sustainability in Czech Organisations
Hana Urbancová, Lucie Vnoučková, Zdenek Linhart, Gabriela Ježková Petrů, Roman Zuzák, Lenka Holečková, Zita Prostějovská
Sustainability  vol: 12  issue: 3  first page: 1064  year: 2020  
doi: 10.3390/su12031064

5. Estilos de comunicación de gobierno en redes sociales por pertenencia generacional
Ana Slimovich, Virginia García Beaudoux
Revista Mexicana de Opinión Pública  issue: 39  first page: 152  year: 2025  
doi: 10.22201/fcpys.24484911e.2025.39.90718

6. Enhancing academic staff retention in an open distance e-Learning higher education institution in South Africa
Tebogo Kefilwe Molotsi, Adele Bezuidenhout, Yvonne Joubert
The Independent Journal of Teaching and Learning  vol: 18  issue: 1  first page: 39  year: 2023  
doi: 10.17159/ijtl.v18i1.17166

7. Work Motivation of Social Workers in the Context of Management Innovations
Peter Gallo, Bohuslava Mihalcova, Beata Balogova
Marketing and Management of Innovations  vol: 14  issue: 1  first page: 55  year: 2023  
doi: 10.21272/mmi.2023.1-05

8. Generational diversity and labor productivity, a pressing problem in Peruvian public institutions
David Hugo Bernedo-Moreira, Jorge Nicolás Alejandro Papanicolau Denegri, Yesenia Tania Loayza-Apaza, Héctor Fredy Pacompía Quispe, Jaime Natanael Gonzales López
Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología - Serie de Conferencias  vol: 2  first page: 381  year: 2023  
doi: 10.56294/sctconf2023381

9. UZAKTAN ÇALIŞMA SİSTEMİNİN ÇALIŞAN MOTİVASYONU ÜZERİNE ETKİLERİ
Ezgi Kuloğlu, Ayşen Temel Eğinli
Sosyolojik Düşün  vol: 9  issue: 2  first page: 189  year: 2024  
doi: 10.37991/sosdus.1486187

10. Un Análisis estructural con SmartPLS de las Prácticas de Consumo de Ropa de Segunda Mano en la Generación Centennial
Ana Lucia Ruiz Vigil, Juan Bernardo Amezcua Núñez, Adriana Mendez Wong
Revista Vértice Universitario   year: 2025  
doi: 10.36792/rvu.v27i96.483

11. Ubuntu leadership as a predictor of employee engagement: A South African study
Kerushan Chetty, Gavin Price
SA Journal of Human Resource Management  vol: 22  year: 2024  
doi: 10.4102/sajhrm.v22i0.2462

12. Motivational factors of Serbian armed forces members
Milan Kovačević, Srđan Blagojević
Bezbednost, Beograd  vol: 64  issue: 1  first page: 72  year: 2022  
doi: 10.5937/bezbednost2201072K

13. Sustainability of the Motivation Policy Model for Employees in State Administration
Milan Kovačević, Srđan Blagojević, Bojan Kuzmanović
Sustainability  vol: 12  issue: 19  first page: 7974  year: 2020  
doi: 10.3390/su12197974

14. Factors Affecting Perceived Effectiveness of Multigenerational Management Leadership and Metacognition among Service Industry Companies
Yoshiki B. Kurata, Ardvin Kester S. Ong, Christienne Joie C. Andrada, Mariela Nicole S. Manalo, Errol John Aldrie U. Sunga, Alvin Racks Martin A. Uy
Sustainability  vol: 14  issue: 21  first page: 13841  year: 2022  
doi: 10.3390/su142113841

15. Work values: a latent class analysis of Korean employees
Jinju Lee, Yunsoo Lee, Soo Jung Kim, Ji Hoon Song
Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning  vol: 12  issue: 5  first page: 834  year: 2022  
doi: 10.1108/HESWBL-10-2021-0188

16. Creative Performance of Millennials and Generation Z: What Matters More, Intrinsic or Extrinsic Rewards?
Shwetha M. Krishna, Somya Agrawal
Administrative Sciences  vol: 15  issue: 1  first page: 11  year: 2024  
doi: 10.3390/admsci15010011

17. Escaping generational conflict: using gamification to examine intergenerational communication & problem-solving
Melanie B. Richards, Karin L. Becker, Jessica Stollings-Holder
Review of Managerial Science  vol: 18  issue: 6  first page: 1597  year: 2024  
doi: 10.1007/s11846-023-00669-2

18. Generational differences in psychological ownership
Chantal Olckers, Corné Booysen
SA Journal of Industrial Psychology  vol: 47  year: 2021  
doi: 10.4102/sajip.v47i0.1844

19. Healthcare interpreters X, Y, Z
Esther Monzó-Nebot, Cristina R. Álvarez-Álvarez
Translation Spaces  vol: 13  issue: 1  first page: 126  year: 2024  
doi: 10.1075/ts.23018.mon